Return to Golf After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

CONTEXT: Patients experiencing pain from femoral acetabular impingement and considering hip arthroscopy may be concerned about their timeline to resume activities they enjoy, such as golf. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review current literature on return-to-play data after hip arthroscopy and to provide clinicians with data to set proper expectations with patients. DATA SOURCES: The following terms were used to search PubMed and Embase electronic databases on October 18, 2023: hip, arthroscopy, arthroscopic, golf. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they were in the English language, of Level 1 to 4 evidence, and contained data specific to golfers undergoing hip arthroscopy. Studies were excluded if they did not designate participants as golfers or did not specify return-to-play data. Editorials, case reports, and review articles were excluded. Screening was completed by 2 authors in a blind and duplicate manner. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. DATA EXTRACTION: The following datapoints were extracted from each study: hip pathology and arthroscopic procedure data; number of players returning to golf and time from surgery to return; outcome score(s); and rehabilitation details. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. RESULTS: The search returned 400 studies, of which 4 were included for analysis. Of these 4 studies, 2 specified return-to-play time. Of 95 golfers, 90 (94.7%) returned to golf successfully after arthroscopic hip surgery. Subjective and objective outcome scores improved postoperatively, including an increased average drive distance. CONCLUSION: Return to golf after hip arthroscopy is highly probable, with approximately 95% of patients throughout literature returning to play. A mean return time of 4.7 months for professional golfers and 7.2 months for amateurs, alongside improved subjective outcomes and performance metrics postsurgery, suggest patients can expect a relatively quick return to the course with similar or improved performance.

Factors influencing physical therapy utilization after shoulder surgery: a retrospective review.

Background: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) is a cornerstone to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Access to postoperative PT can be limited by insurance type, coverage, and cost. With copayments (CP) for PT as high as $75 per visit, PT can be costprohibitive for patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors affecting PT utilization among patients that underwent shoulder surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 80 shoulder surgery patients with postoperative PT sessions attended at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. Patients were divided based on insurance type: private insurance (PI), and Medicare with or without supplemental insurance (MI), and CP or no copayment. Demographics, CP, total, and postoperative number of PT sessions utilized was collected and analyzed. Results: The cohort had 53 females and an average age of 62. There was no significant difference between PI and MI at baseline other than surgery performed (P = .03), older MI group (69 years vs. 56 years: P < .01), and more females in PI group (76% vs. 55%; P = .05). There was no significant difference in the number of PT sessions between groups. The PI group was more likely to have a CP (P < .01). The CP group more often had PI and significantly more total PT visits (P = .05), while the no copayment group more often had Medicare (P < .01). CP was not independently associated with a change in the number of PT visits or total PT visits. Conclusions: The utilization of PT after shoulder surgery was found to not be influenced by insurance type or CP as determined by the number of PT sessions attended. Further investigations are necessary to better understand the relationship between CP and different insurance types and develop effective strategies to increase access to PT for postoperative shoulder patients.

Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review.

Background: Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening. Methods: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures). Results: The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%. Conclusion: This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.

Patients' perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Formal physical therapy (PT) traditionally has been a critical part of postoperative recovery, but recently, because of cost containment, coverage of PT has become limited. Alternatives to formal PT have been proposed, including telerehabilitation, internet-based PT (IBPT), and home-based physician-guided PT. The purpose of this study was to understand patient perceptions of PT, the benefits, perception of improvements, access to PT, and alternative forms of PT after shoulder surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent orthopedic shoulder surgery were anonymously surveyed at one institution. Demographics, PT access, number of PT sessions, insurance, copayment, patients' perceptions of improvement, and their opinion about IBPT were collected. Answers were designed using Likert-scale or open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey data. Analyses were performed based on demographic variables using independent t-test, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Patients attended an average of 16.3 ± 13.8 PT sessions, with 65% ± 32.2 attributing average improvement to their sessions. Average copay was $18 ± 20.8 per session, which 56.1% agreed was reasonable. Almost all patients (94.8%) agreed their therapist took time to educate them. Half (52.5%) disagreed that successful PT could be achieved by IBPT, and 68.6% of patients responded they would not consider using IBPT even after a few in-person sessions. CONCLUSION: Patients have a positive perception of their therapist, cost, number of sessions, and utility of PT to impact improvements after orthopedic shoulder surgery. For IBPT to be a viable alternative, it should involve close engagement of a physical therapist given patients' perceptions of PT.

An integrated educational and multimodal approach to achieving an opioid-free postoperative course after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: In the realm of shoulder surgery, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is one of the most painful procedures and is often associated with higher opioid consumption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative patient education and multimodal pain management to achieve an opioid-free postoperative recovery after RCR. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent RCR were divided in 2 groups. All patientsreceived an interscalene nerve block and multimodal pain management. The opioid intervention group (OIG) in addition received preoperative education on expectations of pain, non opioid pain protocols, and alternate therapiesto minimize pain as well as customized postoperative instructions. Patients were compared on pain levels, opioid consumption, and outcomes scores preoperatively and at 48 hours, 2 weeks, and final follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes and opioid usage were compared and analyzed using student's t-tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: At 48 hours, 15% of OIG patients reported use of rescue opioids after surgery compared with 100% of control group patients. Zero percent of OIG patients reported opioid use at 2 weeks compared to 90% of control group patients (P = .0196). Patients in both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome scores (P ≤ .05). At 6 weeks, functional, Constant, and satisfaction outcome scores were all higher in the OIG (P < .05). At last follow-up, there were no significant differences for all patient-reported outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Application of patient education tools and innovative multimodal pain management protocols successfully eliminates the need for opioids while maintaining excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.